From: "Jim Fletcher" <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 93 10:49:55 EDT

.
Subject: Re: DLUR/DLUS Names

But even dependent LU 6.2s will require "remote SSCP services" so they must
be handled by the DLUx function in order to get services. Then the session
data stream will be LU 6.2 but the control sessions will still require
encapsulation.
------------------------------- Referenced Note ---------------------------
To: [email-masked] (Paul Gacek)
Cc: [email-masked], [email-masked],
        [email-masked], [email-masked]
Subject: Re: DLUR/DLUS Names
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 26 Apr 93 10:01:09 PDT."
             <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 93 11:01:20 PDT
From: [email-masked]

>the feature (i.e. 3270 Dependent LU routing using APPN) name or title should
>contain a reference to 3270.

Nit: Not all dependent LUs are 3270.  LU 6.2 sessions can also be dependent
LUs.  There may not be a lot of SNA traffic over dependent LU 6.2 but it
does exist nonetheless.

>
>
>Paul Gacek
>Novell - Internetworking Products Division
>[email-masked]
>408 321 1288
>
>

Regards,
-----------
Wayne Clark
cisco Systems, Inc.
[email-masked]
415/688-4627